{"id":1188,"date":"2026-10-18T10:05:25","date_gmt":"2026-10-18T14:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/?p=1188"},"modified":"2026-10-22T10:09:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-22T14:09:43","slug":"supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two Supreme Court justices in <em>Herrera-Salazar v. United States<\/em>. The Court\u2019s October 2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/orders\/courtorders\/101326zor_qol1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">decision<\/a> declined to review the case, while an accompanying statement questioned whether a second prosecution violated the protection against double jeopardy. If new charges appear to repeat conduct for which you have already been prosecuted, a St. Petersburg criminal defense attorney can compare the cases and assess the constitutional issues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Two Prosecutions Following One Reentry<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to the Court\u2019s statement, the defendant was indicted in 2020 for being found in the United States after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1326(a). He pleaded guilty, served his prison sentence, and began supervised release. A condition of that release expressly prohibited him from leaving the Eastern District of Oklahoma.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It is reported that while he remained on supervision, officers stopped him in Heavener, Oklahoma. He was arrested and prosecuted again under the same statute. A jury convicted him, and the court imposed another term of imprisonment and supervised release. His challenge concerned a second prosecution arising from his continued presence in the country, rather than a new departure and reentry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/#more-1188\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two Supreme Court justices in Herrera-Salazar v. United States. The Court\u2019s October 2026 decision declined to review the case, while an accompanying statement questioned whether a second prosecution violated the protection against double [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-criminal-defense"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct &#8212; St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog &#8212; October 18, 2026<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two &#8212; October 18, 2026\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct &#8212; St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog &#8212; October 18, 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two &#8212; October 18, 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-18T14:05:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-22T14:09:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hanlon Law, PA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hanlon Law, PA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct &#8212; St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog &#8212; October 18, 2026","description":"Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two &#8212; October 18, 2026","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct &#8212; St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog &#8212; October 18, 2026","og_description":"Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two &#8212; October 18, 2026","og_url":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/","og_site_name":"St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog","article_published_time":"2026-10-18T14:05:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-22T14:09:43+00:00","author":"Hanlon Law, PA","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hanlon Law, PA","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/"},"author":{"name":"Hanlon Law, PA","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e62d4e140f78dfe2fb0dd2758275b312"},"headline":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct","datePublished":"2026-10-18T14:05:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-22T14:09:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/"},"wordCount":664,"articleSection":["Criminal Defense"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/","url":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/","name":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct &#8212; St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog &#8212; October 18, 2026","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-18T14:05:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-22T14:09:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e62d4e140f78dfe2fb0dd2758275b312"},"description":"Serving a sentence should not leave someone facing another prosecution simply for obeying release conditions. Yet that was the dilemma described by two &#8212; October 18, 2026","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/supreme-court-justices-question-prosecution-for-same-continuous-conduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Justices Question Prosecution for Same Continuous Conduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/","name":"St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Blog","description":"Published by St. Petersburg Criminal Lawyer Attorney \u2014 Hanlon Law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e62d4e140f78dfe2fb0dd2758275b312","name":"Hanlon Law, PA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/28c5c60eb08894e1f2f27e2e759788e24587bda0a815ed045456f272f44b2849?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/28c5c60eb08894e1f2f27e2e759788e24587bda0a815ed045456f272f44b2849?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/28c5c60eb08894e1f2f27e2e759788e24587bda0a815ed045456f272f44b2849?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hanlon Law, PA"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1188"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1189,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1188\/revisions\/1189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stpetersburgcriminalattorney.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}